Opinion: Ruby Bowman–“Transparency is not just a slogan!”

Photo by Alexa Mazzarello on Unsplash
This is an opinion piece that was submitted to the Longmont Observer. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the Longmont Observer. The Longmont Observer does not edit, nor spell check, opinion pieces submitted to us. If you have an opinion piece you'd like published, please visit our 'Submit an Opinion' page.

Rogers road residents Kevin Gallagher and Jim Enright were right when they stated in their 1/10/2020 letter in the Observer that council members Tim Waters and Marcia Martin should recuse themselves from any action concerning the Mountain Brook development.  At the 7/9/2019 appeal hearing, Waters publicly disclosed that he and Martin met with the Mountain Brook developer on May 29, 2019, the same day Gallagher and Enright submitted their appeal to the city clerk’s office.  This particular meeting, however, was not the only occasion that Tim Waters met with the developer.  Documents of an open records request show that he had repeated contact with the Mountain Brook developer and agreed to meet with the developer on multiple occasions prior to May 29, 2019.

Text messages, going back to May, 2018, and appointment calendar documents indicate that as of 5/29/2019 council member Waters and the developer agreed to meet approximately 20 times. They made arrangements to meet at various places in Longmont, such as at local coffee shops, at a restaurant, at the developer’s office in Longmont or in a nearby town or at other offices in the city.  It became apparent, after reviewing CORA documents, that Tim Waters afforded unlimited access to the Mountain Brook developer to contact him.  These frequent contacts imply more of a collaboration than an interested party providing input to a city council member.  I wonder if Waters spent as much time with the Rogers Road residents listening to their concerns about the proposed Mountain Brook development as he did with the developer supporting the developer’s special interests. 

Council member Tim Waters should have fully disclosed his repeated contacts and meetings with the Mountain Brook developer at the 7/9/2019 appeal hearing and recused himself from city council votes concerning the development.   He should have also disclosed the content of meeting discussions and the documents he received from the developer.  There was one text message in the CORA documents where Waters instructed the Mountain Brook developer to send some documents to Waters’ home address instead of sending them through his city council email address.  Council member Waters likes to talk about the importance of transparency in city government.  He talks the talk, but he doesn’t always walk the walk. 

Residents of our community work very hard to participate in the public process.  They take time from their jobs and families to attend public meetings with the belief that they’ll be given a fair shake in having their opinions heard and considered by city council.  The system, however, does not always work the way it is supposed to.  Sometimes when citizens are up against a developer with considerable influence and access to decision makers, their opinions fall on deaf ears.  As Rogers road residents Mr. Gallagher and Mr. Enright explained in their open letter to city council, they are “ignored, insulted, and dismissed.”

Ruby Bowman
Longmont, CO  80501


  1. Dear Ruby Bowman,
    Thank you! It was wonderful to see your editorial in favor of the citizens on Rogers Road. It is good to know we are not alone in calling out the very suspicious activities of councilman Waters – and others.
    Bravo! Evil flourishes when good men (and women) do nothing! (Edmund Burke)
    Jim Enright and Kevin Gallagher

  2. from Proverbs 16:12-13 “Good leaders detest wrongdoing. Good leaders take pleasure in honest talk; they value a person who speaks the truth.” There’s something way off about Longmont’s current leadership.
    Thank you for your good communication and research, Ruby.

  3. I have granted a meeting to every single constituent who has requested one. Interestingly, Mr. Enright and Mr. Gallagher have never done so. Ms. Bowman has, in the past, but no longer does so because I value the lives of humans above members of other species and refuse to pretend otherwise. In other words, I am not valued by her for speaking the truth.

    I can only assume that Dr. Waters’ experience is similar. It is very interesting that all manner of wrongdoing is accepted from other members of Council who vote the way they are told rather than consistently in the best interests of the city’s most vulnerable.

    Transparency is different than obediance. I have never deleted a personal email since assuming my elected office, just to be sure that no failures of transparency occur. The Council Member who introduced me to Keven Mulshine, by the way, was Joan Peck, who maintains that she is not obliged to disclose her correspondence.

  4. Sometimes I think that, barely 3 months into the latest round of City Council 2020, the entire council should be called up on referendum. But sadly if that happened, the only ones who would benefit would be the lawyers, at the city’s expense. And all for what council’s thousand dollar a month “salaries”?? Surely then even the developers will stop pretending they need permission to proceed with plans here, there, and soon enough it’ll seem everywhere.

Leave a Reply